Reiki treats no childhood diagnosis. It does not act on ADHD, autism, a learning difficulty or any medical condition, and it never replaces a paediatrician. What it can offer is a short stretch of calm and kind contact, with the child's consent and with you in the room.
You are reading this for your child, not for yourself
It is almost always a mother who writes. Sometimes a father. Rarely the child.
The scene tends to be similar: a child who is not sleeping well, who cries more than usual, who wakes with nightmares, who has gone quiet since something happened at home. Or a teenager who has shut the bedroom door and will not talk.
And parents who have already tried things, unsure whether they are overreacting or underreacting, searching at eleven at night for something that might help.
I understand that. Which is why the first thing I have to say is probably not what you were hoping to read.
First of all: if something changed in your child, see the paediatrician
This is the most important rule in the article.
A change in a child's sleep, behaviour, mood, appetite or school performance goes to the paediatrician first. Not to a therapist. Not to me.
Children do not express distress the way adults do. Pain can look like irritability. A hearing problem can look like inattention. Sleep apnoea can look like a difficult temperament. Anxiety can look like stubbornness. And some things that begin looking emotional have a physical cause worth ruling out.
A paediatrician can tell those apart. I cannot, and neither can any Reiki practitioner.
If your child is under the care of a psychologist, a child psychiatrist, a speech or occupational therapist or any other specialist, that path continues unchanged. Reiki replaces no session, no medication, no check-up.
What Reiki cannot do for a child
I will name things specifically, because vagueness does damage here:
- It does not treat ADHD. No "improves concentration", no "regulates attention".
- It does not treat autism. Autism is not an illness to be fixed, and no energy practice acts on it.
- It does not treat learning, language, developmental or sensory conditions.
- It does not treat childhood anxiety or depression, which have their own effective approaches.
- It does not diagnose anything or "see" what is going on with your child.
- It does not replace medication, therapy, check-ups or school support.
If a practitioner hints at any of that, or says "the child is carrying something" and offers to resolve it in a set number of sessions, walk away. That is not care; it is trading on a legitimate worry.
So what can it offer?
Something small and honest: a quiet stretch of time, with kind contact, in which nothing is asked of the child.
A child spends the day being corrected, assessed, hurried and organised. Half an hour whose only task is to be still — or not even that — is unusual.
What families describe afterwards is this: the child came out looser, slept better that night, was in a better mood that afternoon. It is not a treatment. It is a good hour, and good hours count.
There is also a side effect that sometimes matters as much as the session: for those thirty minutes, the parent sits down and breathes too. That shows up at home as well.
What the evidence says, and why it matters more here
With a child involved, overstating does more damage. Here are the data as they stand.
The NCCIH, part of the US National Institutes of Health, holds that Reiki has not clearly been shown to be effective for any health-related purpose, and has not been shown to be harmful: nccih.nih.gov/health/reiki.
The Cochrane review (Joyce and Herbison, 2015, CD006833) found only three trials of Reiki in anxiety and depression, around 62 participants in total, and concluded there is insufficient evidence.
The meta-analysis by Liu and colleagues (2025, Systematic Reviews 14:72), with 11 trials and 661 participants, found a small, statistically significant improvement in quality of life (SMD = 0.28; 95% CI 0.01–0.56), with high heterogeneity (I² = 65.1%). The meta-analysis by Demir Doğan (2018) on pain found a positive signal, also with methodological limits.
And there is a detail almost nobody mentions: all of that research was done in adults. There is no comparable body of evidence in children. If someone quotes results in children, ask where they come from.
What is well established is that the practice is safe: it administers nothing, manipulates nothing and interferes with no treatment. The risk lies in how it is used, not in the technique.
The child's consent comes first
There is no nuance here.
If the child does not want to, there is no session. Even if you booked it, even if you paid, even if you drove in from Envigado.
Before we start I explain, in their own words, what we are going to do: clothes and shoes stay on, they can sit or lie down, I will put my hands near or on their shoulders or back, and they can say "stop" whenever they want and we stop.
Then I ask whether that sounds all right. If they say no, that is fine. Sometimes they sit and watch while their mother has the session, and next time they want to try.
A child who learns that their "no" is respected in their own body has learned something far more valuable than any session.
An adult in the room for the whole session. Always.
No exceptions, no discussion.
You, or the responsible adult, stay in the room from beginning to end. Not in the waiting area. Not on the other side of the door. Inside.
If a practitioner asks you to leave, or suggests "children relax more without mum there", that is a serious red flag and reason enough to stand up and go. There is no legitimate reason for a minor to be alone with a therapist.
The rest of the conditions I apply:
- The child stays fully clothed, shoes on if they prefer.
- Contact, where there is any, is on shoulders, upper back, arms, hands, feet or head. Nothing else.
- There is never contact on the torso, the abdomen or any intimate area.
- The door can stay ajar if that helps.
- Anything the child says, they say with you present.
How the session adapts by age
| Age | Approximate length | Format | Who is present |
|---|---|---|---|
| Under 5 | 10–15 min, or less | In arms, playing, no stillness required | Parent, always |
| 6 to 9 | 15–20 min | Sitting or lying, everything explained | Parent, in the room |
| 10 to 12 | 20–30 min | Table; old enough to understand and decide | Adult present |
| Teenager | 30–45 min | As with an adult, with their privacy | Adult in the room, discreet |
Times are indicative. A seven-year-old who wants to get up after ten minutes gets up. You do not negotiate with a child to last longer.
Teenagers: a different matter
With a teenager almost everything changes.
First: they usually do not want to be there. They came because they were brought. It matters that they can say so out loud and that they get to decide.
Second: they need some privacy. There is still an adult in the room, but not hovering. The conversation beforehand may be brief or not happen at all, and that is fine.
Third, and most important: if a teenager is in real trouble — sustained sadness, withdrawal, abrupt changes, self-harm, or any sign that frightens you — that is not the territory of a complementary therapy. That is a consultation with child and adolescent mental health, the sooner the better. If that worry appears, leave this article and call the paediatrician.
What a session with a child looks like in my practice
It is considerably less solemn than people imagine.
Small children almost never stay still, and do not need to. I have run sessions with a child sitting on the floor building something, his mother beside him, my hands near his back. They last as long as they last.
With eight- and nine-year-olds it works to explain everything beforehand, with no mystery, and let them touch the table and decide whether to lie down or sit. They ask very direct questions: "does this hurt?", "are you going to read my mind?". You answer honestly: no, and no.
In Medellín I have had several afternoons where the session ended up being for the mother, with the child watching, and that was exactly the session that was needed. In Santa Elena — the cloud-forest village in the mountains above the city — families come up at the weekend and the children spend the hour among the trees. The forest does a fair amount of the work.
I never comment on a child's character in front of them. I never say they are "carrying something". I never interpret a drawing, a gesture or a silence. If something in a conversation worries me, I tell the parents and recommend they raise it with a professional.
Sessions can be held in English. How I work in general is described on the therapy page, and how to tell a serious practitioner apart is in how to choose a practitioner.
Frequently asked questions
From what age can a child receive Reiki? There is no minimum age, since the practice is non-invasive, but the format changes a great deal. With very small children the work happens in a parent's arms, for a few minutes, with no expectation of stillness. What matters is not age but that the child is comfortable, an adult is present, and any symptom has been checked with the paediatrician first.
My child is not sleeping well. Could Reiki help? The paediatrician comes first, always: there are causes of disrupted sleep in childhood with specific treatments, from apnoea to anxiety. Once that is ruled out, a short session can accompany the calm of the evening, without promises. What helps most is routine, screens out of the bedroom and a calm adult nearby. See Reiki for insomnia.
My child has a diagnosis. Can this be of any use? It can offer a calm hour, as for any other child. What it will not do is act on the diagnosis or reduce the need for their therapies, supports or medication. If anyone tells you otherwise, they are not trustworthy. Tell the professional treating your child that you are considering this.
Can I learn Reiki to give it to my child at home? Many parents ask, and the valuable part is the impulse: wanting to place your hands calmly on your child. That makes sense in a home, with or without training. If you do train, do it through a serious route and without therapeutic expectations — you are not treating anything, you are accompanying a quiet moment.
What if my child starts crying during the session? The session stops. They get a hug, or space, depending on what they need. It is not interpreted as "release" or as part of a process: it is a child who is not comfortable, and that is reason enough to stop. If it repeats, tell the paediatrician.
Disclaimer
This article is for educational purposes and does not replace diagnosis, treatment or follow-up by a healthcare professional. Reiki is a complementary practice: it accompanies, it does not substitute. If you are under medical or psychological care, continue it and talk to your treating professional before adding any complementary therapy.
If you are turning this over for your child, write to me on WhatsApp at +57 314 811 7561 and we can talk before you book. If what is needed is something else, I will tell you.
Share this read
Written by
Sananda Reiki
Spiritual support and Reiki therapies in Medellín and online.
Learn more about Sananda


